August 21, 2010 at 10:50 am

ECONOMY WEEKLY August 20, 2010

 
    August 20, 2010  
 
 
“’After its brush with death last year, this segment of the economy [the auto industry] is becoming a bright light in the recovery,’ said economist Joel Naroff of Naroff Economic Advisors.”
[Wall Street Journal, 8/18/10]
 
Economy Highlights:
  • General Motors filed for Initial Public Offering on Wednesday, “highlighting a remarkable turnaround for the corporate giant a year after its bankruptcy and setting the stage for Washington to withdraw from its majority ownership stake in the automaker.” [Washington Post, 8/19/10]
  • Industrial output increased in July, up by 1 percent, with auto manufacturing increasing by 9.9 percent. “The strong gain in industrial production, following a small dip in June, suggested that underlying demand in the economy may be holding up despite worries about slowing growth in the second half [of the year].” [Wall Street Journal, 8/18/10]
  • According to the Federal Reserve, the manufacturing sector continues to grow, rising 1 percent last month, which is twice as much as expected. “That suggests that the recovery in the industrial sector continued solidly as the second half of the year got underway, helping to assuage fears that it would lose momentum as businesses complete a cycle of rebuilding their inventories.”  [Washington Post, 8/18/10]
  • The Federal Reserve announced, this week, that domestic banks have begun to ease lending standards for small businesses. The “new survey was the first indication that credit was easing for smaller companies, those with annual sales of less than $50 million,” for the first time in nearly four years. [Washington Post, 8/17/10]
Recovery Highlight:
  • 94 percent of the funds of the Recovery Act are either in tax cuts, payments or projects under contract and the remaining 6 percent are either awarded and contracts are being finalized or in the final stages of the award process.  “So when critics like Rep. Boehner talk about stopping the spending, they’re essentially talking about taking away middle class tax cuts, leaving unemployed workers unexpectedly high and dry without an unemployment check, halting road and bridge projects and leaving them unfinished, leaving contractors unpaid for the work they’ve already done and more.” -Jared Bernstein, Chief Economic Advisor to the Vice President 8/11/10  
  • $1.8 billion in grants have been awarded by the Commerce and Agriculture Departments to 94 projects in 37 states for broadband infrastructure. The Department of Commerce’s National Telecommunications and Information Administration awarded 66 projects that will develop 25,000 miles of broadband networks, providing access to 19 million households and 1.8 million businesses. The Department of Agriculture’s Rural Utilities Service will extend infrastructure to 1.2 million households. “’These projects will connect Americans who have for too long been without the full economic, educational and social benefits of high-speed Internet access – access central to success in the 21st century,’ [Commerce Secretary] Locke said.” [National Journal, 8/18/10]
  • Share/Bookmark
August 18, 2010 at 8:31 am

$46 Million in Grants to Help States Crack Down on Unreasonable Health Insurance Premium Hikes

45 States and the District of Columbia to Receive $1 Million Each to Make Health Insurance Markets More Consumer-Friendly and Transparent;”>HealthCare.gov badge

HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius today announced grant awards of $46 million to 45 States and the District of Columbia. These Affordable Care Act grants will be used to help improve the oversight of proposed health insurance premium increases, take action against insurers seeking unreasonable rate hikes, and ensure consumers receive value for their premium dollars.

For too long, insurance companies in many States have increased health insurance premiums with little oversight, transparency, or public accountability. Health insurance premiums have doubled on average during the last 10 years, much faster than wages and inflation, putting health coverage out of reach for millions of Americans and business owners. Today, just 26 States and the District of Columbia have the authority to reject a proposed increase that is excessive, lacks justification or otherwise exceeds State standards. Many States that have the authority lack resources to exercise it meaningfully. This lack of authority and resources for States has unfortunately contributed to unjustified premium increases in some States.

“The Affordable Care Act puts in place critical market reforms to improve quality and reduce the cost of health care for employers and individuals. Increased competition, lower insurance overhead, and better risk pooling in health insurance Exchanges in 2014 are expected to reduce premiums in the individual market by anywhere from 14-20 percent according to the Congressional Budget Office,” said Secretary Sebelius. “Between now and then, we will continue to work with States to ensure consumers are receiving value for their premium dollars and to avoid the kind of double digit premium increases seen recently. The State proposals approved today demonstrate the need and desire for new resources and tools to help them protect against unjustifiable premium increases.”

The Affordable Care Act provides States with $250 million in Health Insurance Premium Review Grants over five years to help create a more level playing field by improving how States review proposed health insurance premium increases and holding insurance companies accountable for unjustified premiums increases. Applications for the first round of Health Insurance Premium Review Grants were made available on June 7.

The grants build on the Obama Administration’s work with States to implement the Affordable Care Act. Earlier this year, Secretary Sebelius called on certain insurance companies to justify large premium increases and encouraged State and local officials to obtain stronger health insurance premium review authorities under State laws. This increased scrutiny by the Administration and by several States has led to the withdrawal or reduction of several proposed health insurance premium increases that in some cases turned out to be based on faulty assumptions and data.

States have proposed to use this funding in a variety of ways.

  • Additional Legislative Authority: 15 States and the District of Columbia will pursue additional legislative authority to create a more robust program for reviewing or requiring advanced approval of proposed health insurance premium increases to ensure that they are reasonable;
  • Expand the Scope of Health Insurance Premium Review: 21 States and the District of Columbia will expand the scope of their current health insurance review, for example by reviewing and requiring pre-approval of rate increases for additional health insurance products in their State.
  • Improve the Health Insurance Premium Review Process: All 46 State grantees will require insurance companies to report more extensive information through a new, standardized process to better evaluate proposed premium increases and increase transparency across the marketplace;
  • Make More Information Publicly Available: 42 States and the District of Columbia will increase the transparency of the health insurance premium review process and provide easy-to-understand, consumer friendly information to the public about changes to their premiums; and
  • Develop and Upgrade Technology: All State grantees will develop and upgrade existing technology to streamline data sharing and put information in the hands of consumers more quickly.

“States will use these grant dollars in the way that makes the most sense for their insurance consumers,” said Jay Angoff, Director of the Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight. “As we continue to implement the new health insurance reform law, we will continue to work with States to ensure they have the tools they need to ensure the stability of the marketplace, keep costs low and provide consumers with increased transparency, choice and quality they need to make the best health care decisions for their businesses and families.”

A chart summarizing how each State will use the new resources can be found at http://www.healthcare.gov/news/factsheets/rateschart.html.

The Health Insurance Premium Review Grants are one element of a broad effort under the Affordable Care Act to reduce the unreasonable premium increases proposed by some insurers today. Additional resources from this $250 million program will be available in subsequent years to further strengthen State health insurance premium review procedures. Other statutory provisions designed to improve affordability include:

  • In 2011, the Affordable Care Act allows the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to review justifications for unreasonable increases in premiums and make them public;
  • In 2011, insurers will generally be required to spend at least 80 percent of premium dollars on medical care services and quality-improvement activities and limit their spending on overhead, marketing, CEO salaries, and profits; and
  • In 2014, the Affordable Care Act empowers States to exclude health plans that show a pattern of excessive or unjustified premium increases from the new health insurance Exchanges.

The Affordable Care Act includes a wide variety of provisions designed to promote a high-quality, high-value, health care system for all Americans and to make the health insurance market more consumer-friendly and transparent. Some of the provisions that take effect by the end of next year, or are already in effect, include prohibitions on pre-existing condition exclusions for children; prohibition on lifetime dollar limits in all health plans; extended access to insurance for many young adults; and an unprecedented level of transparency about health insurance through www.HealthCare.gov.

To read more about the grants, visit http://www.healthcare.gov/news/factsheets/rates.html.

To read more about how each State will use its grant funding, visit http://www.healthcare.gov/center/grants/index.html.

  • Share/Bookmark
August 9, 2010 at 11:24 am

US world’s largest stockpile of Cluster Munitions weapons, has not signed the treaty,

International: Cluster Munitions Convention in Effect

 To link to this article, copy this persistent link:
http://www.loc.gov/lawweb/servlet/lloc_news?disp3_l205402148_text

(Aug. 09, 2010) On August 1, 2010, the Convention on Cluster Munitions came into force (text available from the Convention website, http://
www.clusterconvention.org/pages/pages_ii/iia_textenglish.html
. Adopted in Dublin, Ireland, on May 30, 2008, and signed several months later in Oslo, Norway, on December 3, the Convention has been ratified by 38 countries. The first meeting of the parties to the treaty will be held in November 2010 in Vientiane, Laos.

The Convention prohibits the use, stockpiling, production, and transfer of all cluster bombs, which are weapons that come apart into large numbers of smaller explosive components that can spread out before detonating. In addition, the treaty calls for the supplies of such weapons to be eliminated and unexploded bombs to be cleared in the next ten years. These weapons are considered to be especially hazardous for civilians. (Erin Bock, Cluster Munitions Treaty Goes into Effect, PAPER CHASE NEWSBURST (Aug. 1, 2010), http://
jurist.org/paperchase/2010/08/cluster-munitions-treaty-goes-into-eff
ect.php
.)

U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, speaking about the treaty’s coming into force, said it was “a major advance for the global disarmament and humanitarian agendas.” In addition to expressing his pleasure that the Convention came into force in just over two years after its adoption, Ban stated: “[t]his highlights not only the world’s collective revulsion at these abhorrent weapons, but also the power of collaboration among governments, civil society and the United Nations to change attitudes and policies on a threat faced by all humankind.” (UN Hails Entry into Force of Global Pact Banning Cluster Munitions, UN NEWS CENTRE (July 30, 2010), http://
www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=35479&Cr=weapon&Cr1pan>
.)

Amnesty International called the Convention a “crucial step towards protecting civilians, during and after armed conflict, from this cruel and indiscriminate weapon.” The organization urged all nations that have not yet done so to sign and implement the treaty, comparing it to the 1997 pact on land mines. (Cluster Bomb Ban Treaty Takes Effect Worldwide, Amnesty International website (Aug. 1, 2010), http://
www.amnesty.org/en/news-and-updates/cluster-bomb-ban-treaty-takes-ef
fect-worldwide-2010-08-01
.) In recent weeks, both Norway and Moldova have destroyed their cluster munitions, and the United Kingdom has begun the process. (PAPER CHASE NEWSBURST, supra.)

The United States, which has the world’s largest stockpile of these weapons, has not signed the treaty, arguing that a ban on the weapons would hurt humanitarian work by discouraging cooperation between countries that have and have not signed. The U.S. policy, adopted in June 2008, is designed to protect civilians and civilian infrastructure following a conflict, while allowing for the retention of what is considered to be “a legitimate and useful weapon.” (Id.; Memorandum, U.S. Secretary of Defense, DoD Policy on Cluster Munitions and Unintended Harm to Civilians (June 19, 2008), http://
www.defense.gov/news/d20080709cmpolicy.pdf
.)

  • Share/Bookmark
August 5, 2010 at 9:20 am

Social Security & Medicare Report

Statement by Secretary Geithner on the Releases of Social Security and Medicare Trustees Reports

Statement by Secretary Geithner on the Releases of Social Security and Medicare Trustees Reports

For the Social Security Report, visit link below.
For the Medicare Report, visit link below.

The Social Security and Medicare Boards of Trustees met this afternoon to complete their annual financial review of the programs and to transmit their Reports to Congress.  I welcome my fellow Trustees.  I also want to acknowledge the hard work and dedication of the chief actuaries, Stephen Goss and Richard Foster, and their staffs, who worked especially hard this year to incorporate the effects of health care reform in the reports.

Seventy-five years ago this month, President Roosevelt signed the Social Security Act into law, creating the program that tens of millions of Americans now rely on to help them retire with economic security.  Thirty years later, President Johnson signed amendments to that law creating Medicare, providing health insurance for our older Americans.  And this year, President Obama signed the Affordable Care Act, giving Americans more control over their healthcare decisions, ending insurance company abuses, and taking major steps to bring down health care costs over the long term. 

The impact of health care reform is made clear by the Trustees Reports, which show some very positive developments for Social Security and especially Medicare.  But they also remind us that we must continue to make progress addressing the financing challenges facing the long-term solvency of these programs.

When we delivered our Reports last spring I argued that it was imperative that we gain control of Medicare costs by delivering health care services more efficiently, and that doing so requires a larger effort to control health care costs and improve quality more generally.  With the recent enactment of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), we have taken a huge step in that direction.  This new law gives Americans more control over their healthcare decisions, ends insurance company abuses and will bring down health care costs over the long term. 

The Affordable Care Act has dramatically improved projected Medicare finances.  Medicare’s Hospital Insurance (HI) Trust Fund is now expected to remain solvent until 2029, 12 years longer than was projected last year, which is a record increase from one report to the next.  In addition, the 75-year financial shortfall for HI has been reduced to 0.66 percent of taxable payroll from 3.88 percent of taxable payroll in last year’s report, and the projected costs for the Medicare Supplementary Medical Insurance (SMI) program over the next 75 years, expressed as a share of GDP, are down 23 percent relative to the projections in the 2009 report  Nearly all of these improvements in projected Medicare finances are due to the Affordable Care Act President Obama signed into law in March. 

As impressive as these achievements are, there is still work to be done. Although HI financing is projected to be sufficient until 2029, the HI Trust Fund balance is expected to fall below one year’s projected expenditure beginning in 2012, which means the test for  short-range financial adequacy is not met.  And it is projected that SMI will continue to put increasing pressure on the federal budget and beneficiaries in the years ahead, though to a much lesser extent than was projected last year, prior to the passage of the Affordable Care Act.  Over the next 75 years, SMI costs are expected to average 3.3 percent of GDP, which is 1.4 percentage points higher than the SMI cost share of GDP was in 2009, so additional reform measures will be needed.  Those measures will be informed by experiments with alternative provider payment mechanisms and patient care models that are authorized in the ACA, as well as by the recommendations of the newly created Independent Payment Advisory Board. 

The Affordable Care Act also improves Social Security’s finances.  Starting in 2019, a new tax on high-cost health care plans is expected to result in a shift in labor compensation from health insurance to earnings, which are subject to Social Security and Medicare taxes.  This factor more than accounts for the reduction in Social Security’s actuarial deficit to 1.92 percent of taxable payroll from 2.0 percent of taxable payroll projected last year. 

The recession has, however, somewhat worsened Social Security’s very near term outlook.  Benefit payments are expected to exceed tax revenue for the first time this year, six years earlier than was projected last year, but the improving economy is expected to result in rough balance between Social Security taxes and expenditures for several years before the retirement of the baby boom generation swells the beneficiary population and causes deficits to grow rapidly.  It is projected that tax and interest income will be sufficient to pay benefits through 2024, after which the Trust Fund will be drawn down until depleted in 2037, the same date of Trust Fund exhaustion projected last year.  After 2037, it is expected that tax income will be sufficient to finance more than three quarters of scheduled benefits. 

Despite the projection that Social Security can continue to pay full benefits for nearly 30 years, the sooner action is taken the more options for reform will be available and the fairer reforms will be to our children and grandchildren.  Now that we have taken meaningful steps to put Medicare on a sustainable path and moved quickly and aggressively to rescue our economy and put us a path to continued future growth, we must work to address the other intermediate- and long-term fiscal imbalances that the federal government faces as well.

To that end, the President has proposed some important steps to put us on a fiscally responsible path.  First, the Administration’s Budget puts a three-year freeze on non-security discretionary funding.  The President reinstated pay-as-you budgeting that helped lead to the economic prosperity of the 1990s.  And the President has appointed a bipartisan Fiscal Commission which will make further recommendations by the end of the year.  These measures, along with further healing of our economy, will help make sure we have strong and sustainable growth that will benefit all Americans.

LINKS

  • Share/Bookmark
at 7:51 am

Top Ten Bills In Congress Week of August 5 2010

Top Weekly Bills in THOMAS

August 5th, 2010 by Andrew

Since the January enhancements to THOMAS, I’ve been looking at the statistics on user searches and creating a list of the most searched legislation.   Health care legislation has dominated the list since then, jumping around but always somewhere within the top ten.

The current top ten includes:

  1. H.R. 3590
    Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
  2. H.R. 4899
    Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010
  3. H.R. 4173
    Restoring American Financial Stability Act of 2010
  4. H.R. 4213
    American Jobs and Closing Tax Loopholes Act of 2010
  5. H.R. 5297
    Small Business Jobs and Credit Act of 2010
  6. H.R. 3534
    Consolidated Land, Energy, and Aquatic Resources Act of 2009
  7. H.R. 847
    James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act of 2010
  8. H.R. 2267
    Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection, and Enforcement Act
  9. H.R. 5175
    Democracy is Strengthened by Casting Light on Spending in Elections Act
  10. H.R. 4872
    Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010

Our enhancements are primarily based on user feedback.  The Tip of the Week was created because people would ask for a particular feature for THOMAS that was already there.  We took the Tip of the Week one step further with the June enhancements.  Now there is an archive of the tips, an RSS feed, and an email alert.

  • Share/Bookmark
August 1, 2010 at 10:33 am

U.S. Stockpiles Cluster Munitions

UN hails entry into force of global pact banning cluster munitions

 

30 July 2010 – United Nations officials have expressed their delight at Sunday’s entry into force of the international convention banning the manufacture, use and stockpiling of cluster munitions, calling it a “major advance for the global disarmament and humanitarian agendas.”

However; the USA refuses to give up it’s stockpiles. Sighting from the US Secretary of States website:

Cluster munitions have demonstrated military utility. Their elimination from U.S. stockpiles would put the lives of its soldiers and those of its coalition partners at risk. Moreover, cluster munitions can often result in much less collateral damage than unitary weapons, such as a larger bomb or larger artillery shell would cause, if used for the same mission.

Billions of these weapons – which are considered particularly dangerous, despite their lack of precision – are believed to exist around the world and many have been used in recent conflicts, killing or maiming countless civilians.

FACTS:

Cluster bombs have killed and injured thousands of civilians during the last 40 years and continue to do so today. They cause widespread harm on impact and yet remain dangerous, killing and injuring civilians long after a conflict has ended. One third of all recorded cluster munitions casualties are children. 60% of cluster bomb casualties are injured while undertaking their normal activities.

 Among the seven makers of the weapon and components were diversified manufacturer Textron (TXT.N), aerospace and defence group Alliant Techsystems (ATK.N), and defence contractor Lockheed Martin (LMT.N), all U.S. based.

Thirty ratifications were needed to make the pact, which prohibits explosive remnants of war known either as cluster munitions or unexploded ordnance (UXO), a part of international law. That milestone was reached in February when Burkina Faso and Moldova both submitted their instruments of ratification of the Convention on Cluster Munitions at UN Headquarters in New York.Some 98 per cent of victims are civilians and cluster bombs have claimed over 10,000 civilian lives, 40 per cent of whom are children.

The convention, Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said in a statement on Friday, “will help us to counter the widespread insecurity and suffering caused by these terrible weapons, particularly among civilians and children.”

He is particularly pleased, the statement continued, that the pact will enter into force on 1 August, just over two years after it was adopted by 107 States in Dublin, Ireland.

“This highlights not only the world’s collective revulsion at these abhorrent weapons, but also the power of collaboration among governments, civil society and the United Nations to change attitudes and policies on a threat faced by all mankind,” the Secretary-General emphasized.

The convention – negotiated by States that represent past and current producers, stockpilers and victims of cluster munitions – establishes important commitments regarding assistance to victims, clearance of contaminated areas and destruction of stockpiles.

To date, 37 countries have ratified the pact, which also has 107 signatures.

First used in the Second World War, cluster munitions contain dozens of smaller explosives designed to disperse over an area the size of several football fields, but often fail to detonate upon impact, creating large de facto minefields.

The failure rate makes these weapons particularly dangerous for civilians, who continue to be maimed or killed for years after conflicts end. Some 98 per cent of victims are civilians and cluster bombs have claimed over 10,000 civilian lives, 40 per cent of whom are children.

Recovery from conflict is also hampered because the munitions place roads and lands off-limits to farmers and aid workers.

The pact represents “a major advance for the global disarmament and humanitarian agendas,” Mr. Ban noted in his statement, a theme echoed by Daniël Prins, chief of the conventional arms branch of the UN Office for Disarmament Affairs (ODA).

“This is a great step forward – here we have a treaty at the nexus of disarmament and humanitarian efforts,” Mr. Prins said in an interview with the UN News Centre.

He noted that the convention is not merely symbolic, but contains many practical measures, such as requiring States to provide assistance to victims, engage in clearance operations and conduct awareness campaigns so that children do not inadvertently set off explosions.

The first meeting of States parties to the convention will be held this November in Laos, which Mr. Ban said is a country “that has suffered tremendously from the impact of cluster munitions.”

Clearance operations are still ongoing in the South-East Asian nation more than 30 years after conflict left 75 million unexploded cluster bomblets across the country.

Mr. Ban called on all Member States to take part in the November meeting to express their support for the convention, while also urging those nations which have yet to accede to the pact “to do so without delay.”

Cluster munitions have been used in conflicts around the world in recent years, including in the Middle East, South-Eastern Europe, the Caucasus, the Horn of Africa and Central Africa.

The UN Mine Action Service (UNMAS) has been coordinating the removal of cluster munitions in many countries, including Cambodia, Chad, Laos, Lebanon, Tajikistan and Zambia.

Max Kerley, the Director of UNMAS, said he hoped the convention will now gather the kind of support enjoyed by the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Treaty and receive more ratifications in the months ahead.

  • Share/Bookmark
July 29, 2010 at 4:49 am

Keeping Social Security Strong another 75 Years

Office of the Majority Leader - Steny Hoyer
 
    For Immediate Release
July 28, 2010
 
 
 
Hoyer Statement on the 75th
Anniversary of the Social Security Act

WASHINGTON, DC – House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer (MD) joined Speaker Nancy Pelosi, House Democratic Leaders, and House Democrats for a press event ahead of the 75th anniversary of the Social Security Act.  Below are his remarks as prepared for delivery:
“For 75 years, Social Security has been more than a retirement program: it has meant dignity, security, and peace of mind for generations of our seniors. In return for a lifetime of hard work, it has meant that seniors can count on the stable support they’ve earned, no matter what.
                                                                     
“In 1935, Republicans stood in the way of its creation. And in recent years, they’ve only renewed their efforts to undermine and privatize Social Security. President Bush put privatizing Social Security at the top of his agenda in 2005. Fortunately, he didn’t succeed; but today, Republicans have made very clear that this is yet another Bush policy they want to return to if they take back power. Republicans want to subject Social Security to the whims of Wall Street—ending the very security it’s supposed to provide.
“Under the Republican scheme, if seniors were unlucky enough to retire during an economic downturn, they’d find that their retirements had a giant hole in them. Imagine, for instance, that instead of Social Security you put your money in a private account at the beginning of the Bush Administration, and that you invested in the S&P 500 Index. By that Administration’s end, your account would have lost 36% of its value. What would that have meant for your retirement? What would that have meant for your future?
“We owe to seniors to make Social Security sound and sustainable—not subject to market fluctuations. Democrats fought to create Social Security in the face of Republican opposition. And today, in the face of Republican plans to end Social Security as we know it, Democrats are fighting to keep it strong.”
  • Share/Bookmark
July 25, 2010 at 7:58 am

ECONOMY WEEKLY July 19, 2010

 
    July 23, 2010  
 
 
ECONOMY WEEKLY
WEEK OF JULY 19, 2010


“Today, I signed the unemployment insurance extension to restore desperately needed assistance to two and a half million Americans who lost their jobs in the recession.  After a partisan minority used procedural tactics to block the authorization of this assistance three separate times over the past weeks, Americans who are fighting to find a good job and support their families will finally get the support they need to get back on their feet during these tough economic times.”
– President Obama, 7/22/2010 
 
Economy Highlight:
• According to a survey from the National Association for Business Economics (NABE), 31 percent of businesses added workers between April and June, the highest level in three years. In addition, “39 percent of those surveyed say they expect to hire more workers over the next six months — the most since January 2008. Manufacturers reported the strongest increase in demand and profitability.”  [Associated Press, 7/19/2010NABE Survey]
 
 
Recovery Highlight:
•  As part of the Recovery Summer, the White House announced that Vice President Biden will travel to two National Parks next week – Yellowstone and the Grand Canyon – to tout the Recovery Act projects now underway.  These parks have received $25 million in Recovery Act funding, which “is creating jobs and jump-starting previously-deferred construction and maintenance projects.  More than 1,000 workers have already been part of the seventeen Recovery Act projects at Yellowstone and the Grand Canyon.  Overall, there are 800 Recovery Act projects underway at National Parks across the country this summer – eight times as many as there were last summer.”  [White House Advisory; KXFL, 7/23/2010]
  • Share/Bookmark
July 24, 2010 at 10:02 am

Leadership Of Change

Posted by Editor in News

Hoyer Delivers Speech on the Economy and Job Creation


 


WASHINGTON, DC – House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer (MD) delivered a speech today on Democrats’ record on job creation and economic recovery, and how Republicans would take us back to the same failed Bush policies that led to the recession in the first place.  Below are his remarks as prepared for delivery:
“America has faced its share of trying times—times when not just our economy, but our nation, seemed in decline. But each time, with ingenuity, hard work, and our distinctly American optimism, we have built our way out, and we’ve emerged stronger.
“No one doubts that this is one of those testing times. But the question that will be in front of us in this fall’s vote isn’t where we are—it’s where we go from here. It’s a choice between two dramatically different directions. And our decision really comes down to three questions. How far have we come? What remains to be done? And which party will keep moving us forward?

“First, how far have we come? Let’s consider an alternate history:

  • America is facing the worst economic crisis in a generation.
  • Americans are losing almost 800,000 jobs per month.
  • Over a quarter of personal wealth in America has been wiped out.
  • Banks are afraid to lend, businesses are forced into layoffs, and innovative start-ups can’t start up.
  • Foreclosures are devastating neighborhoods.
  • The massive deficit left behind by President Bush makes responding to the crisis even more difficult.
  • A new President and a Democratic Congress are struggling for solutions—
  • but negotiations break down, Congress remains paralyzed, and in the end we do nothing.
“As a result, the nonpartisan CBO tells us that we’d be looking at 2 million additional Americans out of work. The economy would likely have continued to shrink, instead of growing for three straight quarters.
  •  Retirement savings would have remained devastated.
  • And the global recession would have become catastrophic.
It was that bleak picture that led former Reagan economic advisor Martin Feldstein to endorse substantial deficit spending to pump life into the economy, saying, ‘I don’t think we have a choice.’
 
“I know thinking about how much worse off we could have been is not worth much comfort to anyone who’s still struggling to find work. But any honest look at our economy has to start with an honest conversation about the disaster we have to this point averted, as a result of the actions we have taken. A mere year and a half ago, economists across the spectrum were talking in all seriousness about the risk of a second Great Depression.
  •  Instead, we’ve stabilized the financial system, injected demand into the economy, and created jobs.
  • In fact, the private sector has added jobs for six straight months.
  • By comparison, it took more than two years after the end of the last recession for our economy to return to six consecutive months of job growth in the private sector.
  • “That progress started with vital investments, not just in our immediate recovery, but in the foundations of prosperity for years to come.
  • We are rebuilding the roads, railways, and bridges that are our economy’s backbone.
  • We are using Build America Bonds to help local governments invest in the infrastructure projects they need most.
  • We are investing in our children’s future: we’ve kept teachers in the classroom and have helped more young Americans reach their goal of a college education.
  • We’re helping doctors and hospitals computerize medical records, so patients can be treated more effectively.
  • We’ve funded clean energy technology that will help us save energy and become less dependent on foreign oil—technology like a ‘smart grid’ that will respond to changing energy needs in real time. Just as the Internet was created in America with the support of the federal government, today, in partnership with the private sector,
  • we’re laying the groundwork for transformational technology that can shape our economy and create jobs for years to come.
  • And for 98% of Americans, taxes are now lower than they were in any single year under President Bush.
“Despite Republicans’ efforts to demonize those policies, they can’t refute the nonpartisan analysis that shows that they have been responsible for as many as 3 million jobs. They can’t ignore those investments’ benefits in their own communities—not when the House Minority Whip himself has hosted three job fairs featuring employers that have benefitted from just such federal funds. In fact, while all House Republicans voted against these investments, more than half of the Republicans in Congress have taken credit for them in their districts.
“President Obama has also signed into law the HIRE Act, which cuts employers’ taxes for every unemployed worker hired.
 The Treasury Department reported that, between February and May, the HIRE Act gave small businesses $8.5 billion in tax cuts for millions of new workers.
Democrats have also passed legislation helping to support $28 billion in new lending for small businesses, protecting middle-class Americans from abusive credit card lending practices, and making the biggest investment in student lending in history, without adding to the deficit.
“Health insurance reform will have an important jobs impact, as well. A Harvard/USC study found that health reform will create up to 4 million jobs over the next decade, because it makes coverage more affordable for businesses and the self-employed, while putting American companies on a more even playing field with their foreign competitors. And it will free the next generation of American entrepreneurs to innovate and make business decisions on the grounds of opportunity, not on the grounds of keeping their coverage.
“Finally, President Obama has just signed important legislation to put the referees back on the field and hold Wall Street accountable for the reckless conduct that helped crash our economy. Wall Street reform will create an important new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and make sure that borrowers and lenders live up to common-sense standards of responsibility and honesty. It ends TARP. And it ensures that the costs of any future financial crisis will be borne by the financial industry—keeping taxpayers off the hook for future bailouts. Wall Street reform will remove an important source of economic uncertainty, helping to free up the $1.8 trillion in cash sitting on the sidelines in corporate America. That is private sector cash poised to be redeployed into job-creating investments—the kind of investments that led to the chip and the tech boom in the 1990s. The more we strengthen the integrity and transparency of our financial system, the more we rebuild the confidence needed to encourage investment in America, and the more our financial system gets back toward its core purpose: helping allocate capital to families investing in their future and entrepreneurs investing in job creation.
“All of those policies have a common thread: after a lost decade, middle-class Americans now have a Congress and administration that is helping it make up the lost ground and building for future prosperity. All of that work has helped move our economy back toward strength—though, for too many people, that is still not their reality. With millions of Americans still out of work, no one claims that we’ve reached success—and Congress can’t rest.
“So the second question is: what remains to be done? Democrats are fighting for the middle class. Republicans—as much as they want to use the economy as a political weapon—are looking to go back to the very same policies that caused many of the problems the middle class confronts today. In fact, the NRCC Chair, Congressman Pete Sessions, summed up his party’s approach last weekend: ‘We need to go back to the exact same agenda’ of the Bush Administration. By almost all indications, it was an agenda that failed.
“Democrats, on the other hand, are putting forward new ideas to drive our recovery, particularly when it comes to our vital manufacturing sector. That’s why House Democrats are launching the Make it in America agenda: a strategy to boost American manufacturing. For generations, Americans have looked to our manufacturing sector as a source of economic vitality, a source of good-paying jobs, and a source of pride: America has always been proud to be a country that makes things. Some worry that those jobs and that pride are a thing of the past—but Democrats are committed to regaining America’s manufacturing edge. The Make it in America agenda will include bills to encourage investments in industry, improve manufacturing infrastructure and innovation, strengthen the American workforce, and create a level playing field for American manufacturers that compete worldwide.
“The Make it in America agenda is made up of a range of bills that we will bring to the floor in the coming weeks, including:
• The U.S. Manufacturing Enhancement Act, which passed the House on Wednesday, and which makes it easier for American companies to get the materials they need to manufacture goods;
• The SECTORS Act, which also passed the House this week, and which forms partnerships between businesses, unions, and educators to train workers for some of the most needed 21st-century jobs;
• The National Manufacturing Strategy Act, which will direct the president to develop a manufacturing strategy for the nation every four years;
• The End the Trade Deficit Act, which will lead to the development of policies to reduce the trade deficit; and
•  The Clean Energy Technology Manufacturing and Export Assistance Act, which will ensure that clean energy technology firms have the information and assistance they need to compete at home and abroad.
• The Ways and Means Committee is also going to hold hearings that addresses China’s currency policy.
“These bills are just a start: more are to come, and many House Democrats are coming forward with ideas that can contribute to a manufacturing revival. All of these efforts will bolster President Obama’s plan to support 2 million more jobs by doubling U.S. exports in five years—a plan that is already showing success, with exports up significantly over last year. And they will build on the impact we’ve already had: since the beginning of this year, our private sector has actually created 136,000 new manufacturing jobs.
“I hope that Republicans will join us in strengthening our manufacturing sector. I’m glad that many of them supported the Manufacturing Enhancement Act and the SECTORS Act in the House. But the fact remains that Republicans have an 18-month pattern of standing, with near unanimity, against every measure to create jobs for the middle class. A wide range of job-creating ideas are waiting to be enacted, but they continue to face partisan obstruction—even though many of those ideas have won strong bipartisan support before.
“For instance, we would help businesses develop and bring to market new technologies to increase productivity. We would further invest in science, technology, engineering, and math education. We would encourage entrepreneurship and investment by letting businesses deduct start-up expenses and exempting small business capital gains from taxation. We would establish a new fund, without increasing the deficit, to help community banks lend to small businesses—because 45% of small businesses seeking loans were turned down last year. We would extend the R&D credit.
“We would also end tax breaks that encourage corporations to outsource American jobs overseas. Republicans are fighting to keep that loophole open; Democrats want to close it and keep more jobs here.
“Republican obstruction has even extended to unemployment insurance—at a time when there are still five applicants for each new job. Unemployment insurance is one of the most effective ways of stimulating demand, because it’s quickly spent. Moody’s Economy.com found that it produces $1.63 in economic stimulus for every dollar spent. Republicans claim that we can’t afford $34 billion for the unemployed, but then, in the same breath, they demand $676 billion in debt-financed tax cuts for the wealthy. We can also see their lack of fiscal seriousness in a consistent lack of deficit specifics from their leadership. Take this MSNBC analysis of Congressman Pete Sessions and Senator John Cornyn on ‘Meet the Press’: ‘Both Sessions and Cornyn were unable or unwilling to discuss what Republicans would specifically do on the deficit….When NBC’s David Gregory demanded specifics and details of painful choices Republicans were willing to make, Sessions didn’t offer a single one.’ That’s the same thinking that condoned record foreign borrowing under President Bush and did severe harm to our long-term prosperity.
“Democrats understand that short-term deficits have been necessary for our recovery. For the same reason, the House will extend middle-class tax cuts, though we expect the Senate to act first. All of the job-creation measures I’ve discussed, along with those middle-class tax cuts, represent only a small fraction of our real, long-term deficit problem. We do have hard choices to make about our fiscal future, and I’ve spoken about them in detail. But in making those choices, we have to steer between two grave mistakes. One would be following Republicans who want to use our structural deficit as an excuse to put the brakes on recovery, while millions are still unemployed; that would put even more Americans out of work and actually increase the deficits we are trying to reduce. Another mistake would be putting ourselves even deeper into debt by making tax cuts for the wealthy permanent. Republicans seem to be able to hold both of those positions at the same time: a combination of reckless borrowing and middle-class neglect that characterized the Bush years.
“That brings us to the last question. We’ve pulled our country off the edge of disaster. We know what needs to be done for the Americans who are still struggling. Finally, which party can we trust to do it?
 
“We know what the Republican economic philosophy looks like in practice: cut taxes for the rich and gut the regulations that guard against everything from Wall Street excess to oil companies’ negligence. And we know the record those policies generated, when Republicans had the unchecked chance to implement them, just a few short years ago. They drove our economy into the ditch. They created a decade of stagnant incomes—and, during the eight years of the Bush Administration, the worst jobs record since Herbert Hoover.
“Over eight years of President Bush, our economy added just 1 million private-sector jobs—versus 21 million under President Clinton. And it was President Bush who ran $2.13 trillion in deficits and wiped out the biggest surplus in American history.
“That record isn’t an aberration: decade after decade, Democrats have simply performed better on the economy than Republicans. Market analyst Larry Greenberg studied administrations from John F. Kennedy to George W. Bush and found that ‘jobs grew more slowly for each of the Republicans than for any of the Democrats.’
“Princeton political scientist Larry Bartels studied income growth during administrations from Harry Truman to George W. Bush; he found that, to quote a summary of his work, ‘when a Republican president is in power, people at the top of the income distribution experience much larger real income gains than those at the bottom.’ By contrast, ‘Democratic presidents generate higher income gains for all income groups.’
“And, in 2008, the New York Times asked this question: ‘Imagine that [starting in 1929] you had to invest exclusively under either Democratic or Republican administrations. How would you have fared?’ Under Republican administrations, your $10,000 invested in the S&P stock market index would have turned into $11,733; if we’re charitable and exclude Herbert Hoover, the number becomes $51,211. Under Democratic administrations, your $10,000 would have become $300,671.
“So when we talk about Republican economic failure, we aren’t talking about a passing trend. From decade to decade, and today, Democratic policies have supported innovation, the interests of the middle class, and a better standard of living for all Americans. Republican policies have objectively favored the privileged and left working Americans behind.
“We might be able to write off that record if Republicans gave any indication that they’ve reconsidered the policies that created it. But, again, as they put it themselves: ‘We need to go back to the exact same agenda.’
“And when you remember that, Republican behavior over the past months makes perfect sense. Apologizing to BP when Democrats held it accountable for its disaster in the Gulf. Comparing the economic crisis to the size of an ‘ant,’ as Leader Boehner did. Working with bankers and lobbyists to water down Wall Street reform, and then cynically portraying its tough new rules as a ‘bailout.’ Putting debt-financed tax cuts for millionaires ahead of help for the unemployed.
“I am proud to put our party’s middle class record against theirs, any day. Our work is not done. But we’ve stood up to Wall Street, brought access to affordable health care to all Americans, reinstated pay-as-you-go and fiscal discipline, and gone to bat for job creation, in the face of ideological opposition, again and again for 18 months running. Democrats can tell working Americans, with confidence: we have stood for your interests. And we have met crisis with the optimism that defines our country at its best and can make a great nation even greater.
“So often, our biggest leaps have come out of our darkest moments. As President Obama said, ‘In the midst of civil war, we laid railroad tracks from one coast to another ….And a twilight struggle for freedom led to a nation of highways, an American on the moon, and an explosion of technology that still shapes our world.’ And today, if we choose shared growth over spoils for a few, and our common interests over the special interests—then this, too, can be one of those remarkable moments in which we build our way out. We will Make it in America once again.”
 
  • Share/Bookmark
at 7:12 am

New Tool to Help Fight Health Care Fraud in Florida

 HHS Secretary Sebelius and Attorney General Holder to Co-Host Fraud Prevention Summit Tomorrow in Miami

U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius announced today that health care fraud fighters in the state of Florida will now have additional funding to help find potential fraud and abuse in the state’s Medicaid program through the use of Medicaid claims data.

Today, Secretary Sebelius approved Florida’s Medicaid waiver request to help fund a demonstration program that will allow the state’s Medicaid Fraud Control Unit (MFCU) to “mine” Medicaid Management Information System (MMIS) data to identify cases of potential Medicaid fraud.

 Medicaid billing for many health care services in South Florida is disproportionately high compared to other parts of the country. Although significant progress has been made, fraudulent billing health care fraud continues to cost Medicaid millions of dollars. 

“To fight health care fraud, we need to coordinate all of the resources and data we can muster,” said Secretary Sebelius. “By allowing the state of Florida to use more information to find potential fraud in Medicaid, this waiver will improve Florida’s ability to effectively identify and combat fraud and abuse.”

The announcement comes in advance of the Department of Health and Human Services and Department of Justice’s first Regional Health Care Fraud Prevention Summit being held tomorrow at the Knight Center in Miami, Fla.

The summit, which will feature keynotes remarks by U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder and Secretary Sebelius, kicks off the first in a series of day-long summits bringing together a wide array of federal, state, and local partners, beneficiaries, providers, and other interested parties to discuss innovative ways to eliminate fraud within the U.S. health care system.

As part of its efforts to coordinate the fight against fraud across the nation’s health care systems, including Medicaid and Medicare, data mining will allow Florida’s MFCU to sort electronic claims through the use of statistical models and intelligent technologies to uncover patterns and relationships.  Using the identified patterns, investigators can review Medicaid claims activity and history to find abusive or abnormal use of services and billing that may be potentially fraudulent.  Data mining is done with software programs which include algorithms that automatically analyze the MMIS data.

Currently, state MFCUs are prohibited from using federal Medicaid matching funds to detect potential fraud through routine claims review procedures such as screening of claims, analysis of billing practice patterns, or routinely verifying that billed services were actually received by patients, since these functions are a primary program operation function of the state Medicaid agency. 

Instead, MFCUs generally rely on referrals from the State Medicaid agency.  The waiver approved today will allow the Florida MFCU to use federal matching funds to apply sophisticated electronic data mining tools that are beyond the scope of the claims review activities normally performed by the State Medicaid agency to identify potential fraud.  

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) expects the MFCU to work closely with AHCA to ensure their collective efforts are effective. CMS will monitor the progress of this waiver in conjunction with the HHS Office of Inspector General, which has oversight of MFCUs.

“The demonstration approved today will allow Florida’s Medicaid Fraud Control Unit to take full advantage of their expertise in detecting and investigating Medicaid fraud,” said CMS Administrator Don Berwick, M.D.

  • Share/Bookmark